Alberta flushes away money

If ever there were an object example for legislative restrictions on the taxation and spending authorities of government, the government of Alberta would be a great candidate.

If ever there were an object example for legislative restrictions on the taxation and spending authorities of government, the government of Alberta would be a great candidate.

Over the course of the last decade and then some, this province has managed to post accumulated surpluses amounting to better than $50 billion. It’s an amount in excess of what the legislature has confiscated from the citizenry in the form of direct income taxes over that same time period.

In the face of calls for tax and spending reform, the legislative cabal has consistently responded with the same old line that we can’t make these kinds of rash decisions based upon short-term energy prices.

What is arguably the most socialist government in the land has also used the specious argument that the government can ill-afford to give up billions of dollars of valuable tax revenue if it is to be expected to help diversify the Alberta economy in order for us to better weather the inevitable end of our resource-based economy.

Both of these arguments are laughably moronic, and those who make them should be considered profoundly addle minded.

Let’s demolish that first argument by simply looking at the actions of the very group that claims we can’t make long-term taxation decisions based upon short-term wealth.

Just since 1996, if the province had held spending increases to merely match population growth and inflation, our provincial budget would be about half what it is now. That would amount to leaving close to $5,000 in the pockets of every single person in the province, just this year alone.

Had spending controls been put in place, the province could have foregone corporate and personal income taxes and still posted a surplus this year.

Instead, our useless legislators, in the face of rapid economic growth, chose to increase spending as fast as was legislatively possible.

It boils down to a simple question: If we can’t trim taxation based on short-term prosperity, why can we make long-term spending commitments based on short-term prosperity?

You tell me which scenario might have the most beneficial outcome: one in which a few dozen people cloistered within the intellectual vacuum of government, gaze into their navels and magically find a way to transform the provincial economy away from resources and agriculture, or one where a few million people working outside of the narrow confines of government are freed of the burden of onerous taxation and find imaginative ways to invest in their own lives and futures?

This is simple stuff here, kids. Better yet, it’s a proven deal.

In the United States, those states that have the lowest tax burdens are those with the lowest unemployment rates, the most diverse economies, and are the ones leading the U.S. out of recession.

Maybe we should ask ourselves if eliminating personal and corporate taxes might not be a powerful way to attract new businesses, along with financial and intellectual capital to the province.

If families and small businesses were allowed to keep even a few thousand extra dollars per year out of the money that they, not the government, earn for themselves, wouldn’t they make the best choices for themselves as to how to use that money?

Of course they would.

Better yet, what would be the long-term impact of such a profound shift in the way governments think?

If we really want Alberta to have a future beyond the oil and gas years, we need a fundamental shift in the way government looks at the citizenry’s wallets.

Bill Greenwood is a local freelance columnist.

Just Posted

Man from Olds killed in collision near Sundre

A 39-year-old man from Olds was killed in a collision near Sundre… Continue reading

Tips to keep crime at bay this Christmas

’Tis the season for joy and celebration, but the Christmas season can… Continue reading

Olympic ski run designer creates upgrades at Canyon Ski Resort

Jeff Ihaksi says free-style and alpine ski venues are Canada Winter Games-worthy

Updated: Collision expert backs version of crash of driver accused of manslaughter

Daniel Newsham accused of manslaughter in fatal 2016 collision

WATCH: More than 100 protest UN migration pact, carbon tax in Red Deer

Chants of “Trudeau must go” echoed through the streets of downtown Red… Continue reading

Tkachuk’s goal in 3rd gives Flames 2-1 win over Wild

ST. PAUL, Minn. — Matthew Tkachuk scored the go-ahead goal midway through… Continue reading

Women use scent to lure wolf-dog that ran away from Calgary airport

EDMONTON — A woman from Alberta is thanking an unconventional strategy for… Continue reading

Suspect in Alberta, Saskatchewan bank robberies to get mental assessment

MEDICINE HAT, Alta. — A former Winnipeg broadcaster and journalism instructor accused… Continue reading

Trudeau to make it harder for future PM to reverse Senate reforms

OTTAWA — Justin Trudeau says his government hopes to make legal changes… Continue reading

No winning ticket for Friday night’s $60 million Lotto Max jackpot

TORONTO — There was no winning ticket for the $60 million jackpot… Continue reading

All evacuation orders lifted in deadly California wildfire

PARADISE, Calif. — All evacuation orders have been lifted in Paradise more… Continue reading

All aflutter about our feathered friends

Christmas Bird Count will be held Dec. 23

Baylor ties pervade rape case that sparked uproar

DALLAS — The Texas judge who approved a plea deal allowing a… Continue reading

Most Read