Rated: R (for language)
Mark Whitacre was the highest-ranking executive in U.S. history to blow the whistle in a case of corporate fraud. He ended up with a prison sentence three times longer than any of the criminal executives he exposed. To be sure, there was the detail of the $9 million he embezzled along the way.
What we discover toward the end of The Informant! may help explain that theft, although he apparently didn’t want that used in his defence.
Whitacre, persuasively played by Matt Damon in Steven Soderbergh’s new thriller, was a top vice-president of Archer Daniels Midland in Decatur, Ill., one of the 50 largest corporations in America.
Sprawling at the edge of the small central Illinois city, it is surrounded by miles of soybean fields, and if you buy Japanese tofu at Whole Foods, it probably passed through ADM.
Whitacre knew that ADM and its competitors were engaged in global price-fixing that cost consumers billions.
Whitacre is put under pressure to discover the source of contamination, possibly industrial sabotage, in one of ADM’s operations. He engages in unofficial conversations with key competitors overseas and thinks he may be onto something. Then FBI agents swoop down as part of an espionage probe.
He clears himself, but as the agents (Scott Bakula and Joel McHale) are leaving, he calls after them.
He has something he wants to say. They’re blindsided. He tells them ADM has been fixing prices for years, that he has been involved, that he has the details and wants to clear his conscience. His wife, Ginger (Melanie Lynskey), helped him arrive at the decision to do the right thing.
The FBI recruits him as an informant, taps phones, teaches him to wear a wire, and even videotapes price-fixing meetings, building an airtight case. Eventually three officials, including vice-chairman Michael Andreas, son of the founder, were found guilty; the company was fined $100 million and paid another $400 million in a class action lawsuit.
If only it were that simple, The Informant! might have been a corporate thriller like Michael Mann’s The Insider (1999), with Russell Crowe as a whistle-blower in the tobacco industry.
But during the investigation, Mark Whitacre reveals himself as a man of bewildering contradictions. Who would think to attempt an embezzlement and phoney cheque-cashing scheme while literally working under the noses and at the side of FBI accountants? What was the full story of the industrial espionage he halted? Did he really expect that by exposing those above him, it would clear the way for him, one of the key price-fixers, to take command of the company?
What did Whitacre think about anything? Not even his wife was sure.
All is explained, sort of, in The Informant! and as Soderbergh lovingly peels away veil after veil of deception, the film develops into an unexpected human comedy. Not that any of the characters are laughing.
The film is fascinating in the way it reveals two levels of events, not always visible to one another or to the audience. A second viewing would be rewarding, knowing what we find out.
Matt Damon’s performance is deceptively bland. He comes from a world of true-blue Downstate people, without affectations, surrounded by some of the richest farmland in the world. Whitacre’s determination to wear the wire leads to situations where discovery seems inevitable, but he’s seemingly so feckless that suspicion seems misplaced.
What he’s up to is in some ways so very simple. Even if it has the FBI guys banging their heads against the wall.
Mark Whitacre, Ph.D., released a little early after FBI agents called him “an American hero,” is now an executive in a high-tech startup in California and still married to Ginger.
Looking back on his adventure, he recently told his hometown paper, the Decatur Herald and Review: “It’s like I was two people. I assume that’s why they chose Matt Damon for the movie because he plays those roles that have such psychological intensity. In the Bourne movies, he doesn’t even know who he is.”
Roger Ebert is a syndicated movie critic for The Chicago Sun Times.