Skip to content

Alberta premier says province watching proposed Springbank Dam project closely

CALGARY — Alberta’s premier says it’s possible a proposed reservoir to protect Calgary from floods will have to go back to the drawing board if federal regulators say no or court delays persist.
18652962_web1_CPT13411971
Premier Jason Kenney. (Photo by THE CANADIAN PRESS)

CALGARY — Alberta’s premier says it’s possible a proposed reservoir to protect Calgary from floods will have to go back to the drawing board if federal regulators say no or court delays persist.

Opponents of the dry reservoir at Springback, just west of Calgary, presented 842 signatures against the project during a meeting Monday with United Conservative MLA for Banff-Kananaskis, Miranda Rosin.

The location has drawn the ire of community members in Redwood Meadows, landowners in Springbank, the Municipal District of Rocky View and the Tsuut’ina Nation.

The reservoir was identified as a priority after severe flooding that washed through Calgary and area in 2013.

It has taken years for regulators to review the current Springbank Dam proposal and there’s still no answer.

Alberta’s former NDP government submitted a report to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, which then required a fully revised report with more detailed information.

“Turns out the NDP had failed to submit thousands of documents to the federal environmental regulator. We’ve done that,” said Kenney at a media availability Monday.

“We’re going to have to follow this closely because there are alternative proposals. And if it looks like the feds are not going to give approval or there is no timely way to resolve the First Nations objections, then we will have to look at other projects.”

Kenney said his government is not looking at other locations at this point.

“One way or another we need flood mitigation. I’ve never been married to one path in particular but to the principle of flood mitigation,” he said.

If legal barriers to the dam become insurmountable, it would be preferable to go back to Square 1 rather than endure 10 years of endless court litigation, he said.