The Supreme Court of Canada is seen in Ottawa. File photo by THE CANADIAN PRESS

Trial time limits from Jordan ruling don’t apply to deliberation: Supreme Court

OTTAWA — A Manitoba man’s right to a speedy trial was not breached when the trial judge took nine months to deliberate and issue his verdict, the Supreme Court of Canada said Friday.

The judges were unanimous that deliberations by a judge cannot be unreasonably long but are not included in the 30-month time limit set by the Supreme Court in the 2016 “Jordan” case.

In that pivotal decision, the top court set out rules meant to ensure that lower courts respect an accused’s right to a trial within a reasonable time, as guaranteed in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

That included that the time from charges being laid until the end of a trial should be no longer than 18 months for cases heard in provincial courts and 30 months for those heard in superior courts, with rare exceptions.

A man known only as K.G.K. to protect the identity of the minor victim in the case argued that his rights were violated when a Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench judge took nine months to deliberate before convicting him of sexual assault, sexual interference and invitation to sexual touching.

The trial itself was completed before the Jordan decision was delivered in July 2016, but the verdict came three months after Jordan. In all, it was 42 months from the time K.G.K. was charged until the verdict was given.

The Manitoba Court of Appeal disagreed with K.G.K. but because the decision was not unanimous it automatically went to the Supreme Court for appeal.

The high court heard the case in September in Winnipeg, the first time in the court’s history it heard a case outside of Ottawa.

K.G.K.’s lawyer argued that the Jordan ceiling must include the deliberation period, but in Friday’s decision, the Supreme Court disagreed.

“Properly construed, the Jordan ceilings apply from the date of the charge until the actual or anticipated end of the evidence and argument,” wrote Justice Michael Moldaver in the decision.

The ruling says a judge’s time to deliberate is included in an accused’s general right to be tried in a reasonable amount of time, but outside the specific 18- and 30-month ceilings the Supreme Court has set.

The court did not say exactly how much time a judge can take but did set out some tests for it, including comparing it to how long decisions took in similar cases. Judges should also at least note how close to the Jordan time limit the trial got.

In this case, they said the nine-month deliberation time was close to the line but was ultimately not unreasonable.

The judges said including deliberations in the 30-month ceiling is impractical, because if a complex case takes almost that long to allow hearing all the witnesses and evidence, a judge cannot be expected to rush to a verdict just to meet the limit.

As well they said the Jordan ceilings were established to correct a systemic problem of criminal cases taking too long, but they said the time it was taking judges to deliberate and issue verdicts was not part of that systemic issue.

K.G.K. had also argued the case should be stayed because the trial itself took longer than the 30 months allowed in Jordan, but because this case was heard before the Jordan ruling it was considered to be part of a transition phase. The Supreme Court decided the time for the trial was fine under the transitional rules.

Get local stories you won't find anywhere else right to your inbox.
Sign up here

Just Posted

Parliament may need to be recalled again to approve wage subsidy program

OTTAWA — Canadians are supposed to get more details today of the… Continue reading

A message from the Advocate publisher

In good times and bad, The Red Deer Advocate has been here… Continue reading

US death toll eclipses China’s as reinforcements head to NYC

NEW YORK — The U.S. death toll from the coronavirus climbed past… Continue reading

Long john producer Stanfield’s reacts to COVID-19 with ‘pivot’ to medical gowns

HALIFAX — A historic Canadian undergarment factory famed for long johns and… Continue reading

The latest numbers on COVID-19 in Canada

The latest numbers of confirmed and presumptive COVID-19 cases in Canada as… Continue reading

WATCH: Firefighters, RCMP help Red Deer boy celebrate 3rd birthday

Firefighters and RCMP officers helped a Red Deer boy celebrate his third… Continue reading

Alberta Health Services provides COVID-19 prevention tips

Alberta Health Services has a number of recommendations for people amid the… Continue reading

Alberta government website has latest COVID-19 statistics

Red Deer Advocate readers can stay up to date on the COVID-19… Continue reading

Sylvan Lake photographer captures family life from the front steps

Deb McNeil is taking porch portraits to share the uniqueness of families during COVID-19

A message from Waskasoo Medical Clinic

A Message From Waskasoo Medical Clinic Waskasoo Medical Clinic (including our walk-in… Continue reading

Montreal Impact midfielder Shamit Shome making most of time alone

Montreal Impact midfielder Shamit Shome has been making the most of his… Continue reading

Queen’s Plate, Canadian Open close to decisions for 2020 during COVID-19 pandemic

TORONTO — While Toronto’s ban on city-led events through June 30 does… Continue reading

Organizations inject funds to support Canada’s arts sector during COVID-19

Arts organizations are injecting funds to help cultural institutions and creators stay… Continue reading

Need a laugh? SiriusXM launches channel for female comics

NEW YORK — The midst of a global pandemic might seem like… Continue reading

Most Read