A carbon tax for us all

The stars seem to be aligning for an improved carbon tax in Alberta. Goodness knows, there’s plenty of room for improvement there. Alberta, you will recall, was the first jurisdiction in North America to institute a tax penalty for greenhouse gas pollution, back in 2007.

The stars seem to be aligning for an improved carbon tax in Alberta. Goodness knows, there’s plenty of room for improvement there.

Alberta, you will recall, was the first jurisdiction in North America to institute a tax penalty for greenhouse gas pollution, back in 2007. The tax was named by a committee that obviously stayed up way too late coming to agreement: it’s called the Specified Gas Emitters Regulation.

The financial penalty under SGER has been pretty mild, the funds it raised have been poorly used and there is no indication anywhere that it served to reduce either intensity or total greenhouse gas emissions in the province.

The specified polluters pay $15 a tonne for that part of their carbon pollution that exceeds a baseline. The polluters only pay for a maximum of 12 per cent of their total emissions, and one document I found said it only costs the companies $1.80 a tonne to meet the targets.

The money went into a tech fund that mostly paid for research to help energy companies improve their own oil and gas production. The tax improved the lives of zero Albertans — except for those who administered the program and accessed the money. Zero as well, for the environment.

Still, the philosophy behind the plan was sound.

Globally, about 80 per cent of all greenhouse gas emissions are produced by consumers. We drive cars, we turn on our coffee makers in the morning, we heat our homes in the winter. Everything we do has a carbon footprint.

But the global numbers don’t apply in Alberta. Because of the energy intensity of Alberta’s heavy industry, our province produces a whopping 36 per cent of all the greenhouse gases produced in Canada. Our oilsands projects trump the influence of consumer emissions in our province, plus that of Ontario, or probably more.

That’s why Suncor CEO Steve Williams is on board with a new carbon tax for Alberta. That also influenced how Prime Minister Stephen Harper recently set a national goal for Canada to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 30 per cent in 15 years.

Canada simply can’t become a better global citizen until we solve the problem of how to get those 168 billion barrels of oil out of the oilsands, using less energy.

Williams agrees to a carbon tax, but he wants it to be universal. He wants the consumers to be involved. That serves his purposes, because the vast majority of his customers burn Suncor’s oil outside of Canada.

The federal government’s plan is to help Suncor and all the other oilsands conglomerates buy carbon credits on the international market. No cap-and-trade for Canadians, no sir, no way — but globally, the Harper government makes it the cornerstone of our emissions reduction program. Go figure.

In the past, Albertans derided a carbon tax as merely a cash transfer from Alberta to the feds. Harper wants to go that one better — by transferring the money right out of Canada.

I say we need a hybrid of the plans.

Williams is right: consumers do need to know that what they do has a pollution price. In British Columbia, that price (their carbon tax) replaces part of their income tax system. Ride a bike to work, reduce your taxes. Lower the thermostat a bit in the winter, reduce your taxes. Waste less, reduce your taxes.

But that can’t be the total answer in Alberta. We could be pushing our bikes through deep snow (I’ve done it and it’s hard), and shivering in our homes all winter, and still not make a significant dent in Alberta’s total emissions, because of the oilsands.

Nobody can reasonably suggest we leave the oilsands in the ground. No country sitting on 168 billion barrels of crude would do that. None.

So if carbon credits need to be bought, why not buy them from me? OK, and you.

We appear to have consensus here, so tax both consumers and the big producers. Use the money to both reduce the burden of other taxes and to encourage more non-fossil energy sources. I can adapt my behaviour to fit the program.

But more, make it easy for me to put a few solar panels on my house and garage. Pay me the full market rate for all the solar power that I don’t use. Let the big power producers have a carbon credit from that, which they can sell.

The technology is improving rapidly for at-home storage of solar power and industrial-grade storage of wind power. There’s a huge potential for both total greenhouse gas reduction and carbon credits to offset Alberta’s unique burden from oilsands production.

I could live with that, could you? Isn’t that the philosophy behind what both Williams and Harper say they want? So if the consensus already exists for this, do it.

But let the consumers who want to become carbon conservers benefit — in cash, directly. That’s the only way the plan will actually work.

Greg Neiman is a retired Advocate editor. Follow his blog at readersadvocate.blogspot.ca or email greg.neiman.blog@gmail.com.

Just Posted

Alberta hiring more paramedics and buying new ambulances, none for Red Deer

Red Deer Mayor Tara Veer is not concerned the provincial government didn’t… Continue reading

‘My nightmare began again’: Close call as bus carrying Humboldt crash survivor rear-ended

CALGARY — A terrifying ordeal for Humboldt Broncos survivor Ryan Straschnitzki this… Continue reading

Halifax airport operations normalize after Boeing 747 runway overshoot

HALIFAX — The Halifax Stanfield International Airport has resumed normal operations a… Continue reading

Bentley family left without a home grateful for community support

Central Albertans are coming together to support a Bentley family left homeless… Continue reading

Red Deer RCMP ready for new mandatory alcohol screening law

Red Deer RCMP are ready to enforce a new law intended to… Continue reading

WATCH: Red Deer and District Kennel Club Dog Show at Westerner Park

The Red Deer and District Kennel Club is holding a dog show… Continue reading

Pence aide out of running to be Trump’s next chief of staff

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump’s top pick to replace chief of staff… Continue reading

Swath of South faces wintry mess: Snow, sleet, freezing rain

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — A massive storm brought snow, sleet, and freezing rain… Continue reading

‘I killed my best friend’: Opioids’ fatal grip on mayor, pal

MOUNT CARBON, Pa. — Janel Firestone found her son — the 24-year-old,… Continue reading

Brothers, 20, face second-degree murder charge in death of teen: police

MISSISSAUGA, Ont. — Police west of Toronto say two brothers have been… Continue reading

A young mayor, his friend, and a fatal attraction to opioids

MOUNT CARBON, Pa. — Janel Firestone found her son — the 24-year-old,… Continue reading

GM fights to retain key tax credit amid plant closing plans

WASHINGTON — General Motors is fighting to retain a valuable tax credit… Continue reading

TTC union asks provincial government to step in on transition to Presto

TORONTO — The union representing transit workers in Canada’s most populous city… Continue reading

Small pot growers find roadblocks on path to microcultivation licences

Yan Boissonneault’s daughter was turning blue. Without warning, his baby had stopped… Continue reading

Most Read