American president appears to have little appetite for fighting climate change

“We want to be in (the new UN climate pact), we want to be pragmatic, we want to look at the science,” said Jonathan Pershing, the head of the U.S. delegation, during the talks on cutting greenhouse gas emissions in Bonn last week.

“We want to be in (the new UN climate pact), we want to be pragmatic, we want to look at the science,” said Jonathan Pershing, the head of the U.S. delegation, during the talks on cutting greenhouse gas emissions in Bonn last week.

So how will the Obama administration reconcile political “pragmatism” with the scientific realities? “There is a small window where they overlap. We hope to find it,” Pershing explained. But it doesn’t really exist.

Signing the United States up to the new climate treaty that will replace the Kyoto accord in 2012 is essential.

The 1997 Kyoto treaty was gutted to accommodate American objections, but even so President Clinton, who signed it, never dared to submit it to Congress. Then President Bush “unsigned” it.

A dozen wasted years later, the climate problem has grown hugely, so this time everybody else is determined that the US must be aboard – and Barack Obama also wants the United States to be part of the treaty. But we recently learned what he thinks is “pragmatic”. It is that the United States should cut its emissions back to the 1990 level by 2020.

“Pragmatism” is the excuse you use when you do less than you

should, because doing more is too hard. Taking a dozen years just to get

back US emissions back down to where they were in 1990 definitely qualifies

as “pragmatic,” but it also qualifies as suicidal folly.

The Hadley Climate Centre in England, one of the world’s most

respected sources of climate predictions, recently released a study showing

that even rapid cuts in global greenhouse gas emissions, turning the

current one percent annual growth into a three percent annual decline

within a few years, would still warm the world by 1.7 degrees Celsius by

2050.

That is dangerously near the two degrees C rise in average global

temperature which is the point of no return. Further warming would trigger

natural processes that release vast quantities of greenhouse gases into the

atmosphere from melting permafrost and warming oceans. These processes,

once begun, are unstoppable, and could make the planet four, five or six

degrees hotter than the present by the end of the century.

At those temperatures, much of the planet turns to desert, and the

remaining farmland, mostly in the high latitudes, can support at best ten

or twenty percent of the world’s current population. That is why the

official policy of the European Union is never to exceed two degrees of

warming.

The Obama administration’s offer falls far short of that goal.

Under the Kyoto accord the US promised a 7 percent cut on 1990 emissions by

2012, but President Bush abandoned that target and American emissions are

now 16 percent above the 1990 level. President Obama is only promising to

get back down to the 1990 level over the next eleven years, and forget

about the further cuts that the US signed up to a dozen years ago.

Obama is clearly calculating how much he can get through Congress.

As Pershing said in Bonn, “If we set a target that is un-meetable

technically, or we can’t pass it politically, then we’re in the same

position we are in now — where the world looks to us and we are out of the

regime.”

But this isn’t an ordinary bill where you settle for what you can

get through Congress after the usual horse-trading. If there’s going to be

a forty-day flood, you either build an ark or you learn to breathe

underwater. Building half an ark is not a useful option.

Obama’s offer means that the United States would be cutting its

emissions not by three percent annually, the minimum global target if we

hope to avoid more than two degrees of warming, but by only half that

amount. In the long term, it leads inexorably to disaster.

The other two major delinquents among the industrialised countries

are following similar tactics. Australia, which had long been in denial

about climate change, ratified the Kyoto accord after the 2007 election,

but the new government is offering emissions cuts of only between five and

fifteen percent by 2020. That is a target that makes even Obama’s offer

look good.

Canada, which ratified the Kyoto accord long ago and promised a six

percent cut in emissions by 2012, simply ignored its obligations and is now

20 percent above its 1990 level of emissions. It has no intention of trying

to make up the lost ground, and has unilaterally moved its benchmark from

1990 to 2006.

Most other industrialised countries are on track to meet or exceed

their modest Kyoto targets. Britain and Germany will both be 20 percent

below their 1990 emissions level by 2012, and Germany is promising 40

percent cuts by 2020. The European Union as a whole promises a 20 percent

cut by 2020, but will go up to 30 percent if other industrial countries do

the same.

Even that would barely meet the annual three percent cut in

emissions we need if we are not to sail through the two-degree point of no

return and trigger runaway warming. And we have yet to figure out how to

bring the rapidly developing countries into the regime, for their

emissions, though starting from a low base, are growing very fast.

We are in deep trouble, and “pragmatism” will not save us.

Gwynne Dyer is a London-based independent journalist.

Just Posted

Shale oil producer seeking long-term river water supply

A company behind what is billed as Canada’s first commercial shale oil… Continue reading

Red Deer’s crisis line workers are busy dealing with multiple emergencies

Callers need everything from mental health counselling to their basic needs met

Pleaded guilty: Ex-Red Deer teacher gets 3 years for sex offences against kids

SASKATOON — A former Saskatoon teacher who admitted to sexual offences involving… Continue reading

Rental market picking up in Red Deer

There are fewer “for rent” signs in Red Deer than there have… Continue reading

Alberta government to partially backstop new $2 billion dollar bitumen upgrader

CALGARY — The Alberta government is providing a $440 million loan guarantee… Continue reading

2-for-1: Total lunar eclipse comes with supermoon bonus

On Sunday night, the moon, Earth and sun lined up to create the eclipse, which was visible throughout North and South America

New Canada Food Guide nixes portion sizes, promotes plant-based proteins

OTTAWA — The Canada Food Guide’s familiar food rainbow has been replaced… Continue reading

New Canada Food Guide nixes portion sizes, promotes plant-based proteins

Guide no longer lists milk and dairy products as a distinct food group

B.C. animators land Oscar nominations

‘Animal Behaviour’ by Vancouver’s David Fine and Alison Snowden among several Canadians on the short list

Canadian talent abound on newly revamped Vancouver Whitecaps squad

VANCOUVER — The Vancouver Whitecaps may need to stock up on maple… Continue reading

China demands US drop Huawei extradition request with Canada

China detained two Canadians on Dec. 10 in an apparent attempt to pressure Canada to release Meng

Rugby Canada Hall of Fame a family affair for hard-nosed forward Hans de Goede

Hans de Goede, a hard-nosed lock forward who captained Canada at the… Continue reading

5 burning questions ahead of the Oscar nominations

NEW YORK — The Oscars still don’t have a host, but on… Continue reading

Most Read