American president appears to have little appetite for fighting climate change

“We want to be in (the new UN climate pact), we want to be pragmatic, we want to look at the science,” said Jonathan Pershing, the head of the U.S. delegation, during the talks on cutting greenhouse gas emissions in Bonn last week.

“We want to be in (the new UN climate pact), we want to be pragmatic, we want to look at the science,” said Jonathan Pershing, the head of the U.S. delegation, during the talks on cutting greenhouse gas emissions in Bonn last week.

So how will the Obama administration reconcile political “pragmatism” with the scientific realities? “There is a small window where they overlap. We hope to find it,” Pershing explained. But it doesn’t really exist.

Signing the United States up to the new climate treaty that will replace the Kyoto accord in 2012 is essential.

The 1997 Kyoto treaty was gutted to accommodate American objections, but even so President Clinton, who signed it, never dared to submit it to Congress. Then President Bush “unsigned” it.

A dozen wasted years later, the climate problem has grown hugely, so this time everybody else is determined that the US must be aboard – and Barack Obama also wants the United States to be part of the treaty. But we recently learned what he thinks is “pragmatic”. It is that the United States should cut its emissions back to the 1990 level by 2020.

“Pragmatism” is the excuse you use when you do less than you

should, because doing more is too hard. Taking a dozen years just to get

back US emissions back down to where they were in 1990 definitely qualifies

as “pragmatic,” but it also qualifies as suicidal folly.

The Hadley Climate Centre in England, one of the world’s most

respected sources of climate predictions, recently released a study showing

that even rapid cuts in global greenhouse gas emissions, turning the

current one percent annual growth into a three percent annual decline

within a few years, would still warm the world by 1.7 degrees Celsius by

2050.

That is dangerously near the two degrees C rise in average global

temperature which is the point of no return. Further warming would trigger

natural processes that release vast quantities of greenhouse gases into the

atmosphere from melting permafrost and warming oceans. These processes,

once begun, are unstoppable, and could make the planet four, five or six

degrees hotter than the present by the end of the century.

At those temperatures, much of the planet turns to desert, and the

remaining farmland, mostly in the high latitudes, can support at best ten

or twenty percent of the world’s current population. That is why the

official policy of the European Union is never to exceed two degrees of

warming.

The Obama administration’s offer falls far short of that goal.

Under the Kyoto accord the US promised a 7 percent cut on 1990 emissions by

2012, but President Bush abandoned that target and American emissions are

now 16 percent above the 1990 level. President Obama is only promising to

get back down to the 1990 level over the next eleven years, and forget

about the further cuts that the US signed up to a dozen years ago.

Obama is clearly calculating how much he can get through Congress.

As Pershing said in Bonn, “If we set a target that is un-meetable

technically, or we can’t pass it politically, then we’re in the same

position we are in now — where the world looks to us and we are out of the

regime.”

But this isn’t an ordinary bill where you settle for what you can

get through Congress after the usual horse-trading. If there’s going to be

a forty-day flood, you either build an ark or you learn to breathe

underwater. Building half an ark is not a useful option.

Obama’s offer means that the United States would be cutting its

emissions not by three percent annually, the minimum global target if we

hope to avoid more than two degrees of warming, but by only half that

amount. In the long term, it leads inexorably to disaster.

The other two major delinquents among the industrialised countries

are following similar tactics. Australia, which had long been in denial

about climate change, ratified the Kyoto accord after the 2007 election,

but the new government is offering emissions cuts of only between five and

fifteen percent by 2020. That is a target that makes even Obama’s offer

look good.

Canada, which ratified the Kyoto accord long ago and promised a six

percent cut in emissions by 2012, simply ignored its obligations and is now

20 percent above its 1990 level of emissions. It has no intention of trying

to make up the lost ground, and has unilaterally moved its benchmark from

1990 to 2006.

Most other industrialised countries are on track to meet or exceed

their modest Kyoto targets. Britain and Germany will both be 20 percent

below their 1990 emissions level by 2012, and Germany is promising 40

percent cuts by 2020. The European Union as a whole promises a 20 percent

cut by 2020, but will go up to 30 percent if other industrial countries do

the same.

Even that would barely meet the annual three percent cut in

emissions we need if we are not to sail through the two-degree point of no

return and trigger runaway warming. And we have yet to figure out how to

bring the rapidly developing countries into the regime, for their

emissions, though starting from a low base, are growing very fast.

We are in deep trouble, and “pragmatism” will not save us.

Gwynne Dyer is a London-based independent journalist.

Just Posted

Red Deer RCMP seek public assistance to identify suspect in indecent acts

Red Deer RCMP are asking for public assistance to identify a man… Continue reading

Singer k.d. lang is only Central Alberta native to get 2018 Alberta Order of Excellence

Red Deer native Lorenzo Donadeo does get business honour, however

WATCH: Two weeks away from Canadian Finals Rodeo in Red Deer

In just two weeks, Ponoka’s Shayna Weir will compete with the best… Continue reading

Film with Fan Bingbing, Bruce Willis cancelled after tax case

BEIJING — The director of “Air Strike,” featuring Chinese actress Fan Bingbing,… Continue reading

Michael Buble shuts down rumours of retirement from music

LOS ANGELES — Michael Buble is shutting down rumours that he’s going… Continue reading

After Canada legalizes pot, industry eyes rest of the world

MONTREAL — Cam Battley is a top executive at one of Canada’s… Continue reading

Facebook’s election ‘war room’ takes aim at fake information

MENLO PARK, Calif. — In an otherwise innocuous part of Facebook’s expansive… Continue reading

Military to overhaul morale-boosting trips after review finds serious problems

OTTAWA — Canada’s top general is overhauling military morale-boosting tours after an… Continue reading

Police hand out a few hefty fines for allegedly violating Cannabis Act

The celebratory mood that marked the legalization of recreational cannabis lost a… Continue reading

PHOTO: Say goodbye to City Hall Park flowers

A sure sign that winter is on its way is when City… Continue reading

PHOTO: Chew On This! campaign draws attention to national poverty

Lunch bags were being handed out in front of The Hub downtown… Continue reading

Most Read