More spending is not the answer

Tuesday’s Advocate carried two banner headlines: Awash in debt: Recession deficits could reach almost $156 billion, with hundreds of thousands out of work. And: City could ride high-speed rail to ‘Super Zone.’

Tuesday’s Advocate carried two banner headlines: Awash in debt: Recession deficits could reach almost $156 billion, with hundreds of thousands out of work.

And: City could ride high-speed rail to ‘Super Zone.’

What is it with this stupid train that self-professed rational people can’t grasp the connection between infatuation with big government and economic devastation?

Let’s juxtapose even further by going just a few pages into that same newspaper, and find Premier Ed Stelmach crowing about pouring some $600 for every man, woman, and child in Alberta into the carbon capture sinkhole in the faint hope of slaying the mythical dragon of global warming.

Why do politicians become so infatuated with these black holes of taxpayer dollars?

Every time this high-speed rail issue comes up, we’re treated to a host of local dignitaries fawning over the supposed economic benefits to the region.

We routinely hear of how it will create jobs, and bring in new investment because people will be able to live in Red Deer and work in Calgary or Edmonton.

Yet, those very same politicians and planners also spend millions of our dollars trying to convince us we need to plan for a future where we live even closer to where we work.

Well, which is it guys?

We’re asked to believe that a 300 to 480 km/h train will provide the most economic benefit, yet the reality proposed, with three stops between Edmonton and Calgary, makes the system no better than the existing air connections available, and we all know that it’s inconceivable for Red Deer to support daily air service at comparable cost to high speed rail, so our economic contribution to this thing’s viability is a wash.

Along with being awash in public debt, we apparently are awash in politicians who lack the ability to simply think.

Time and again, we hear how some grand public expenditure will have even more grandiose economic benefits.

We’re asked to believe that if we spend $5 billion or $ 20 billion here, we’ll somehow reap $15 billion or $30 billion down the road. If this were actually true, then Quebec and the Maritimes would be the economic breadbasket of Canada.

So, if we’re willing to believe that if we take a couple of billion dollars from the people who earned it, and to whom it rightfully belongs, and give it to snake oil salesmen (read: the Van Horne Institute, among others), we’ll somehow reap great benefits, why aren’t we able to believe that if we allow the people who actually own the money in the first place to keep even more of it, that the same economic benefits might occur?

Every day now, our leaders are willing to remind us that our lower corporate tax rates will bring in greater investment from abroad, especially from the United States. They’re right. It will.

Yet, at the same time, they can’t shake their own reflexive Keynesianism. They can’t escape having been raised in a country that still widely believes in an economic theory that’s as discredited as the Grassy Knoll Shooters Theory.

We can’t grow our economy on runaway public spending and debt.

Our MLAs know that. Our MP knows it. Our mayor knows it. Yet, bring up high-speed rail and they climb to the rooftops to crow the benefits of it, knowing full well that the only way this thing will ever turn a wheel is if we, the people, are compelled through taxation to support it.

The political pressure to build this thing with our money is profound. If it weren’t, it would have died long ago. The benefits, we’re told, are all encompassing.

All of these schemes are the same and they seem to underscore the sheer ignorance of our leadership, or something worse.

High-speed rail chews up billions of public dollars everywhere it exists; yet it will be magically successful here. Is our mayor unaware of this? If so, why? And, if not, then a more serious problem exists.

Carbon capture will save us from global warming, yet the Earth has been on a cooling trend since 1998. Is our premier unaware of this? If so, why? And, if not, then an even more serious problem exists.

A great deal of our economic problems stem from governments having too much access to money that isn’t theirs.

We, the people, must take the steps to be ever more diligent in reducing profligate spending and rapacious taxation.

Bill Greenwood is a local freelance columnist.

Just Posted

Person airlifted to hospital after collision near Innisfail

One person was airlifted to hospital after a serious collision west of… Continue reading

Sunny weather improves farmers’ prospects

A harvester kicking up dust. It’s a picture that will bring a… Continue reading

Rural transit pilot project being considered

Penhold, Innisfail and Red Deer County councils to decide whether to go ahead with project

Red Deer fire station up for sale

Home sweet home at Fire Station 4

‘Stupid’ law preventing Canada’s re-engagement with Iran: retired envoy

OTTAWA — The real reason the Liberal government hasn’t been able to… Continue reading

Voters head to polls for BC municipal elections today

VANCOUVER — Voters in British Columbia will head to the polls today… Continue reading

All sharks tagged in N.S. expedition can now be tracked on Ocearch website

HALIFAX — All six of the sharks tagged in Nova Scotian waters… Continue reading

Memorial service for former PQ minister Lise Payette today in Montreal

MONTREAL — Mourners will gather to remember former Parti Quebecois cabinet minister… Continue reading

Immunotherapy scores a first win against some breast cancers

For the first time, one of the new immunotherapy drugs has shown… Continue reading

‘Mom I’m in trouble:’ Canadian, Brit face 10 years in jail for alleged graffiti

GRANDE PRAIRIE, Alta. — The mother of a Canadian who was arrested… Continue reading

Coyote on the prowl near Penhold

This coyote was out on the prowl in a field just west… Continue reading

Most Read