Taxpayers have a right to be totally outraged

Social philosophers call it a contract, not a deal, but here it is: Millions of ordinary people agree not to holler too loudly as long as the powerful few don’t abuse public trust too obviously.

Social philosophers call it a contract, not a deal, but here it is: Millions of ordinary people agree not to holler too loudly as long as the powerful few don’t abuse public trust too obviously.

Six days of Brian Mulroney testimony gives law-abiding, taxpaying citizens urgent cause to reconsider the bargain.

Until the former prime minister began telling his story, there was a consensus that the worst damage had already been done. After all, there’s been ample time to reach collective conclusions about a man who rose to Canada’s highest elected office only to plunge to the depths of pocketing suspect cash.

That consensus was wrong. Having already tested any remaining public faith in public officials, Mulroney is now straining the assumption that we all equally share the burden of paying income tax.

Mulroney’s “pretty good deal,” as inquiry commissioner Jeffrey Oliphant labelled a six-year-late tax settlement, suggests everyone else’s is a bit raw. It would be unwise for you to tuck $225,000 in household safes and a bank deposit box, keep silent about it for six years and then expect to pay taxes on only half.

True, kindly federal and Quebec tax collectors, the same ones who routinely impose deadlines, instalment payments and compound interest penalties, didn’t know they were dealing with the 18th prime minister of Canada. But it’s also true that Richard Wolson, Oliphant’s relentless counsel, keeps drawing attention to what should have been known before any federal lawyer or accountant reached any agreement with Mulroney.

The most disturbing of those deals – and the one now most likely to trouble Stephen Harper – is the decision to pay Mulroney $2.1 million to settle a lawsuit over the 1995 letter Canada sent to the Swiss about the RCMP Airbus investigation.

What the federal government didn’t know when it wrote that cheque was that Mulroney’s relationship with lobbyist Karlheinz Schreiber went well beyond the occasional cup of coffee to three memorably large cash payments.

Sounding every bit the seasoned politician, Mulroney insists he was ready with the truth if federal lawyers had only posed precisely the right question.

Whatever the explanation, the impression remains, fair or not, that Mulroney got another pretty good deal when Ottawa bought its way out of his legal action.

Hours of inquiry curiosity have been exhausted on that settlement.

So it’s a relatively safe bet that Oliphant will offer a perspective of keen interest to Harper.

Any suggestion that millions changed hands on the strength of vague Mulroney Airbus testimony would inflame claims that Canadians are owed a refund.

Just the possibility is enough to cause shudders in a ruling party already divided by this inquiry and Harper’s edict to keep away from Mulroney. With an election in the rising wind, a Conservative government would be under intense public pressure to pursue a former Conservative prime minister.

A strikingly similar inquiry and effort to repair the past ruptured Liberals in 2004. Now Harper, who after capturing the old Tory party began taking credit for all its historic achievements, could find himself, too much like Paul Martin, distancing himself from one of the party’s embarrassments and a toxic political predecessor.

That would be hazardous. Harper would either risk a Conservative schism or be forced to pretend that this inquiry hasn’t torn apart the deal binding powerful politicians to ordinary people and that the pieces are lying on the floor.

Jim Travers writes for the Toronto Star Syndicate.

Just Posted

Whispering Pines raises $40,000 for STARS

The golf and country resort held its fifth annual STARS Charity Golf Tournament this past weekend

Man dies in vehicle rollover west of Red Deer

Rocky Mountain House RCMP investigate

UPDATED: Lee seeks UCP nomination in Red Deer

Eyes Red Deer-North constituency

Updated Red Deer smoke free bylaw to ban smoking cannabis in public

Smoke Free Bylaw returns to Red Deer city council Sept. 4

Red Deer city council considers new business licence bylaw

All businesses operating in the City of Red Deer will require a… Continue reading

Updated Red Deer smoke free bylaw to ban smoking cannabis in public

Smoke Free Bylaw returns to Red Deer city council Sept. 4

Case of truck driver charged in Humboldt Broncos crash adjourned until October

MELFORT, Sask. — The case of a Calgary truck driver charged in… Continue reading

Animal crackers break out of their cages

After more than a century behind bars, the beasts on boxes of… Continue reading

Alligator kills woman trying to protect her dog at resort

HILTON HEAD ISLAND, S.C. — A woman who often walked her dog… Continue reading

Patients redirected as water leak shuts down Edmonton hospital’s emergency room

EDMONTON — Ambulances are being redirected to other hospitals after a water… Continue reading

Parks Canada moves second bison bull that wandered out of Banff National Park

BANFF — Parks Canada says a second bison bull that wandered out… Continue reading

Lottery for parent sponsorship to be replaced, more applications to be accepted

OTTAWA — The Trudeau government is scrapping an unpopular lottery system for… Continue reading

Air Canada-led consortium signs deal to buy Aeroplan program from Aimia

TORONTO — A consortium led by Air Canada has reached a deal… Continue reading

Scheer going to India to ‘repair’ relationship after ‘disastrous’ Trudeau trip

OTTAWA — Six months after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s foreign policy prowess… Continue reading

Most Read


Five-day delivery plus unlimited digital access for $185 for 260 issues (must live in delivery area to qualify) Unlimited Digital Access 99 cents for the first four weeks and then only $15 per month Five-day delivery plus unlimited digital access for $15 a month