The door to free speech

Stephen Boissoin’s views on homosexuality are ignorant and offensive, but they should never have been censored, nor brought before the Alberta Human Rights Commission.

Stephen Boissoin’s views on homosexuality are ignorant and offensive, but they should never have been censored, nor brought before the Alberta Human Rights Commission.

Darren Lund’s views on Boissoin and his views on the Red Deer Advocate’s decision to run a letter on gays by Boissoin in 2002 have been counterproductive, wasteful and spurious. They effectively put a chill on the aggressive debate of certain ideas in Alberta.

The commission should never have entertained, let alone heard or ruled on, Lund’s complaint about the letter, which carried the headline Homosexual agenda wicked. Lund sought to stifle open debate about homosexuality and the role of schools and others in espousing and supporting gay rights and alternate lifestyles.

His complaint to the Albertan Human Rights Commission about Boissoin’s letter, and the Advocate, subsequently launched a vigorous debate about the validity of the commission and the sanctity of free speech in this province (for that, at least, we should be thankful).

In the end, the commission ruled that Boissoin’s letter defied the legislation by discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation and may have played a role in the Red Deer beating of a teenager. It ordered Boissoin to pay two people — $5,000 to Lund and $2,000 to a witness — who were not direct subjects nor victims of his letter. It also ordered the Advocate to publish a letter of apology by Boissoin. Boissoin would not write such a letter.

It was an intrusive ruling that left the malingering impression that newspapers should not be left to their own time-tested judgments about how to run their own businesses.

It was also a ruling without the due process of a court of law, without the vigorous rules of evidence and investigation.

And it has taken seven and a half years for the debate over Boissoin’s letter to the editor to reach a conclusion — providing that Lund, a former Red Deer school teacher who is now a University of Calgary professor, chooses not to appeal Court of Queen’s Bench Justice Earl Wilson’s decision last week to overturn the 2007 human rights commission ruling.

In 2007, a commission panel agreed with Lund’s complaint, which was based on Section 3 of Alberta’s human rights legislation. Yet the panel’s examination of evidence was hardly thorough, in part because the legislation does not demand the thoroughness of a court of law. The process is a quasi-judicial mishmash that costs all participants dearly, and drains public resources that could be better spent on such initiatives as education about tolerance and inclusion.

Conducting a tribunal is not the way to expose insidious ideas. To examine such ideas, and to determine what bit of truth may rest within even the most contemptible of those ideas, we need open public discourse. We must be willing and able to challenge even the most central of ideas, so that they may continue to evolve and, ultimately, inspire.

To do otherwise, either by official dictum or choice, is to create a conspiracy of silence, and that breeds stagnation and, ultimately, revolt.

Hateful ideas should not go unchallenged in the court of public discourse and in the courts of the land if those ideas are judged to break our criminal laws.

By setting aside the human rights commission’s decision, the Court of Queen’s Bench has helped to ensure that fair, open examination of ideas will continue.

Now the provincial government must follow suit and remove those parts of the human rights legislation that allow such specious claims.

John Stewart is the Advocate’s managing editor.

Just Posted

Cannabis legalization won’t impact one Red Deer pot dispensary

Nothing changes for Compass Cannabis Clinic in Red Deer despite legalization

Cannabis retail store will open later in October in Red Deer

Two cannabis stores coming to downtown Red Deer

Neighbours drop opposition to Red Deer County communications tower

Communication tower to be located in Balmoral Heights

Legal cannabis comes with many unknowns: Red Deer County councillors

Councillors question how rural municipalities will be able to enforce cannabis regulations

Kitten season puts pressure on Red Deer shelter

More public education needed to control cat population

WATCH: Two weeks away from Canadian Finals Rodeo in Red Deer

In just two weeks, Ponoka’s Shayna Weir will compete with the best… Continue reading

‘Start low, go slow’: Experts walk bud beginners through cannabis 101

With the countdown to cannabis legalization Wednesday ticking towards 4-20, some novice… Continue reading

NHL stays with status quo as Canada pot legalization looms

As Riley Cote took and delivered countless punches over more than a… Continue reading

Paul Stanley: Kiss farewell tour could include ex-members

ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. — It won’t be all night, but former members… Continue reading

Judge tosses Stormy Daniels’ defamation suit against Trump

WASHINGTON — A federal judge dismissed Stormy Daniels’ defamation lawsuit against President… Continue reading

Canada open to growing trade with China now that USMCA is a done deal: PM

TORONTO — Canada is open to doing more business with China now… Continue reading

Pot shop raids “highly unlikely” on Wednesday: head of police chiefs

VANCOUVER — Police departments across Canada are fully prepared for marijuana legalization… Continue reading

Campers will be able to smoke cannabis at campsites in Canada’s national parks

Parks Canada says visitors should do their research on cannabis before going… Continue reading

U.S. pot firms urge Trump to deny Canadian producers’ ‘competitive advantage’

WASHINGTON — An American cannabis producer is warning President Donald Trump that… Continue reading

Most Read