Finance Minister Jim Flaherty tables the federal budget in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday.

Flaherty, caucus split on expanding income-splitting

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty opened a rift within the Conservative cabinet on Wednesday by casting doubt on the wisdom of using next year’s expected budget surplus to expand income-splitting ahead of the next election.

OTTAWA — Finance Minister Jim Flaherty opened a rift within the Conservative cabinet on Wednesday by casting doubt on the wisdom of using next year’s expected budget surplus to expand income-splitting ahead of the next election.

Income-splitting for families with dependents under the age of 18 was a key promise the governing Tories made in the last election, but with a catch: it was contingent on a balanced budget.

The federal budget Flaherty introduced Tuesday projects a $6.4-billion surplus in 2015, just in time for the coming election.

On Wednesday, however, Flaherty lobbed a grenade into the Conservative caucus room when he said he personally thinks blowing part of that money on a promise that’s expected to cost upwards of $2.5 billion is not the way to go.

“I would pay down public debt and reduce taxes more, myself, but I am only one person,” he said in a post-budget interview before the Ottawa Chamber of Commerce.

Prudent fiscal management has historically served Canada well, but federal governments lost their way over the last 50 years and became spendthrifts, Flaherty continued.

“We’ve created a large public debt and we should deal with it and we should knock it down,” he said. “Not for my sake, it won’t make any difference to me, but it will make a big difference to the next generations.”

Opposition Leader Tom Mulcair pounced on Flaherty’s comments, asking Prime Minister Stephen Harper if he agreed that income-splitting would provide no relief to the vast majority of Canadian families.

“This government said in the last election, made a commitment, that when we balance the budget … one of the highest priorities of this government will be tax reduction for Canadian families,” Harper said.

But cracks had already started to appear within Tory ranks about whether they should abandon the promise.

Treasury Board President Tony Clement and Employment Minister Jason Kenney said they back income-splitting, while Maxime Bernier, minister of state for small business, seemed to side with Flaherty.

“I know what our campaign commitments are and I stand by those commitments,” Clement said.

Echoed Kenney: “We made a platform commitment to introduce income-splitting when we get to a balanced budget. We’ll get to a balanced budget next year, that’s very clear.”

Industry Minister James Moore, however, dodged direct questions about where he stands on income-splitting.

“You’re talking about 2015. We have to get through 2014 first,” Moore said.

New Democrat MP Peter Julian could barely contain his glee as he described the “incoherence” within the federal cabinet and the Prime Minister’s Office.

“We now have a finance minister backtracking from what was a key Conservative commitment,” he said.

The C.D. Howe Institute has calculated it will cost federal coffers $2.7 billion a year — plus $1.7 billion from the provinces — to allow couples with young children to split up to $50,000 of their income for income-tax purposes.

And the Tories have yet to implement another costly campaign promise: doubling the original $5,000 annual limit on contributions to tax-free savings accounts.

Critics say both policies would favour only a small segment of the population. With record household debt, many families can’t afford to sock away $10,000 a year, they note.

The institute has argued that 85 per cent of households, particularly single parents, would gain nothing from the income-splitting proposal. As well, it estimated 40 per cent of total benefits would go to families with income above $125,000, who could gain up to $6,400 from Ottawa, with more savings potentially coming from the provincial tax bill.

Rajotte acknowledged that the policy would likely benefit only a small percentage of the population.

“It’s a simple fact that there’s a certain percentage of the population — those families with two parents that have incomes that are very disparate — benefit from it,” Rajotte said.

“Those situations where two people working outside the home, with incomes that are comparable, obviously they’re not going to benefit not nearly as much from a measure like this.”

University of Calgary economist Jack Mintz has argued those problems can be fixed if income-splitting is accompanied by other measures that would allow the benefits to be shared by other kinds of families.

Just Posted

Updated: Red Deer welcomes 2019 Canada Winter Games Team Alberta

About 250 Alberta athletes are participating in the Games

Syrian immigrants feel welcomed

Winter Social held at Festival Hall to promote multiculturalism

Small group rallies with pro-immigration message

Group wanted to counter misinformation on United Nations migration agreement

Trump says ‘things are going very well’ with North Korea

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump said Saturday that “things are going very… Continue reading

NDP won’t stop until Trans Mountain is built, says minister

Deron Bilous speaks at Red Deer chamber luncheon

VIDEO: Students in MAGA hats mock Native American at Indigenous Peoples March

Diocese in Kentucky says it is investigating the matter, caught on video by onlookers

CONSUMER REPORT: What to buy each month in 2019 to save money

Resolve to buy all of the things you want and need, but pay less money for them

Anxiety in Alaska as endless aftershocks rattle residents

Seismologists expect the temblors to continue for months, although the frequency has lessened

Women’s March returns across the U.S. amid shutdown and controversy

The original march in 2017, the day after President Donald Trump’s inauguration, drew hundreds of thousands of people

Kriechmayr edges Swiss favourite Feuz to win WCup downhill

WENGEN, Switzerland — It takes a special run to beat Switzerland’s best… Continue reading

WestJet plane heading to Victoria slides off Edmonton runway, no injuries

EDMONTON — A WestJet plane has slid off an icy taxiway at… Continue reading

Sam Bennett scores twice, Flames beat Red Wings 6-4

Flames 6, Red Wings 4 CALGARY — Sam Bennett scored twice including… Continue reading

Rare ‘super blood wolf moon’ takes to the skies this Sunday

Celestial event happens only three times this century

Most Read