No cameras for Graham James sentencing

WINNIPEG — A Manitoba judge says allowing cameras to broadcast the sentencing of disgraced former hockey coach Graham James for sexual abuse would turn the highly charged case into a spectacle and could violate the sex offender’s privacy.

WINNIPEG — A Manitoba judge says allowing cameras to broadcast the sentencing of disgraced former hockey coach Graham James for sexual abuse would turn the highly charged case into a spectacle and could violate the sex offender’s privacy.

Judge Catherine Carlson denied an application Monday by a media consortium to set up two live TV cameras in the Winnipeg courtroom where James will learn his fate Tuesday.

“This case is highly charged enough. It’s not going to become a spectacle,” Carlson said in her ruling. “This is, first and foremost, a sexual assault case and, in particular, a case of sexual assaults committed against persons under the age of 18.”

James pleaded guilty in December to repeated sexual assaults on two former junior players — Theo Fleury and Todd Holt — when they played for him in the Western Hockey League in the 1980s and ’90s. Fleury would go on to star in the National Hockey League with the Calgary Flames.

The decision to deny televised coverage of what happens in the courtroom means the wider public won’t get a chance to see James — or his reaction to his sentence — since he has managed to hide his face whenever he has been out in the open.

The media consortium had argued on Friday that people have a right to know what James looks like so they can protect themselves. CTV, CBC, Global and the Winnipeg Free Press wanted to have two stationary cameras installed in the room to record James, the lawyers and the judge.

Evan Roitenberg, James’s lawyer, argued that broadcasting his client’s image would violate his privacy and could pose a serious threat to his safety. He said James had received credible death threats and would have difficulty reintegrating into society if his image were widely broadcast.

Carlson said she shared some of those privacy concerns.

“Once images are broadcast on the Internet, they are there in perpetuity,” she said. “Without having to decide what, if any, privacy rights Mr. James has or does not have in a courtroom, I can certainly say I have the same concerns about his images from the courtroom being broadcast on the Internet with no controls.”

Although both of James’s victims have chosen to be named, the judge said she also has a duty to protect them from the glare of publicity and its aftermath while they are in her courtroom.

Details of the sexual acts between James and his victims will be included in the reasons for his sentence, Carlson said.

“This could be extremely embarrassing for the victims since portions of the reasons being read, perhaps the sexually explicit portions, could show up on the Internet any time linked with other material that is out of control of the applicants, out of control of the victims and out of control of the court,” she said.

“The court cannot sanction anything that could result in any type of revictimization.”

The prospect of having cameras in the courtroom in a sexual assault case could also deter other victims from coming forward, Carlson suggested.

“Indeed, it took Mr. Fleury and Mr. Holt many years to make the decision to disclose the offences that Mr. James committed against them,” she said. “If victims have to worry there may be a camera anywhere near the court proceedings, it is reasonable to expect they may not come forward. That would certainly impede the interests of the administration of justice.”

The Crown is seeking six years in prison for James, while the defence is asking for a conditional sentence of up to 18 months with no jail time.

A rising star in the junior hockey world, James first gained infamy when he pleaded guilty in 1997 to sexually abusing Sheldon Kennedy, who would also go on to play in the NHL.

James served about 18 months of a 3 1/2 year-sentence before he got out of jail in 2000 and dropped out of public view.

Carlson’s ruling comes after a British Columbia judge denied an application for cameras to televise the sentencing hearing for the first person to plead guilty in Vancouver’s Stanley Cup riot. That ruling prompted the provincial government to back off its pledge to allow cameras in the courts.

Just Posted

Maskwacis RCMP investigate deaths of toddlers found in body of water

MASKWACIS, Alta. — Alberta RCMP are investigating the deaths of a young… Continue reading

Premier kicks off Westerner Days with optimistic message

Premier Jason Kenney spoke at Westerner Days President’s Lunch after participating in parade

Six central Alberta companies nominated for building awards

BILD Awards ceremony takes place on Sept. 13

Gypsy horses have it all — beauty and a good personality

Gypsy Vanner horse owners competing at Westerner through Thursday

Syphilis cases jump in central Alberta

Province looking at testing and public awareness

Devers hits solo shot, drives in 4; Red Sox beat Jays 5-4

Red Sox 5 Blue Jays 4 BOSTON — Rafael Devers hit a… Continue reading

Argonauts still looking for first win as they face Stampeders on road

CALGARY — Dave Dickenson warned that the Calgary Stampeders can’t take a… Continue reading

Natural gas producers demand government action in open letter to Kenney

CALGARY — The CEOs of nine Alberta natural gas producers have released… Continue reading

Fundraiser helps combat stigma of addiction

A fundraiser for the Safe Harbour Society to educate about opioid addiction was held on July 13

High school a top priority for Blackfalds

Revised capital plan also comes from extensive, collaborative dialogue with the Town of Blackfalds

Seamus O’Regan faces calls to visit Attawapiskat during state of emergency

OTTAWA — Indigenous Services Minister Seamus O’Regan faced calls Wednesday from the… Continue reading

Trudeau to push trade pact in EU leaders’ summit as France moves ahead on CETA

MONTREAL — Lawmakers in France begin their ratification of the comprehensive trade… Continue reading

Most Read