Skip to content

Review finds firing of rogue LA officer justified

An internal review by the Los Angeles Police Department concluded that a rogue ex-officer was justifiably fired five years before authorities say he went on a deadly rampage that led to a massive manhunt, a lawyer who reviewed the findings told The Associated Press on Tuesday.

LOS ANGELES — An internal review by the Los Angeles Police Department concluded that a rogue ex-officer was justifiably fired five years before authorities say he went on a deadly rampage that led to a massive manhunt, a lawyer who reviewed the findings told The Associated Press on Tuesday.

Authorities say Christopher Dorner killed four people, including two law enforcement officers, during the weeklong rampage in February, authorities said.

He apparently killed himself while holed up in a burning cabin after a gunbattle with police.

Civil rights attorney Connie Rice said the lengthy internal review found no basis for allegations of racism and bias that Dorner made in a manifesto vowing revenge on his former colleagues and their families.

The findings, which are expected to be made public this month at a Los Angeles Police Commission meeting, concluded that Dorner had a history of embellishing stories, misperceiving slights and making bogus complaints against his fellow officers, Rice said.

He took more than twice as long as most officers to complete his training, was nearly incomprehensible during the hearing over his firing, and only filed a complaint against his training officer when he learned she gave him a bad performance review, Rice said.

The LAPD won’t comment on the findings until they have been publicly released and reviewed by commissioners, said police Lt. Andrew Neiman.

Chief Charlie Beck ordered the review as Dorner was on the run after being accused of killing the daughter of his former union lawyer and her fiance and releasing the manifesto saying he would get even for being unfairly fired because he was black.

Rice, a longtime department watchdog and frequent critic, was allowed to review the findings.

“The firing was justified and his allegations are completely unfounded,” said Rice, who spent two weeks reviewing the findings. “This guy needed to go. And the question was, even if he needed to go, did the LAPD get rid of him in a way that was illegitimate? And the answer for me was no.”

The roughly 40-page report relied on about 80 documents, including 900 pages of transcripts from the Board of Rights hearing that concluded Dorner lied when he claimed a training officer had brutally kicked a mentally ill man during an arrest. He was fired for making a false report and a Los Angeles Superior Court judge sided with the department during a 2010 appeal.

The review conducted by Gerry Chaleff, the LAPD’s special assistant for constitutional policing, also re-examined at least 10 complaints Dorner officially lodged with the department while he was an officer, Rice said.

In his manifesto, Dorner said the LAPD had tarnished his reputation, ruined the former Navy reserve’s military career, and destroyed his life.